Review rubric and document  6/13/24, 5:56 PMRubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6982 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2245) – UMGC Learning

Review rubric and document 

6/13/24, 5:56 PMRubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6982 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2245) – UMGC Learning Management System

Page 1 of 1

Discussion Rubric CSIA
Course: CSIA 300 6982 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2245)

Total

Overall Score

Criteria Exceeds Meets Needs Improvement Does Not Meet Criterion Score

Quality of the Initial

Post: Expresses

coherent, well-

reasoned thinking as

supported by evidence

included in the

discussion post.

Accuracy: Specifically

addresses topics and/or

questions in the

discussion instructions.

/ 15

Quality and frequency

of interactions:

Responses in the 2

replies are substantive

and add value and

advance the

conversation.

/ 15

Timeliness: Posts initial

response by before

Sunday at 11:59 PM ET

and additional critiques

and follow-up

responses by Tuesday

at 11:59 ET.

/ 10

15 points

Posts a complete, and

coherent initial response

to the discussion prompt

that fully addresses all

the elements of the

discussion topic or

question.

Posts ideas that address

assigned topics and/or

questions and

demonstrates a creative

approach.

10 points

Posts a somewhat

coherent response to the

initial discussion topic,

but the response is

missing major points.

5 points

Covers some aspects of

the question(s) posed,

thoughts are mostly

clearly expressed or well

thought-out, but not all.

May contain some helpful

follow-through. Missing

attribution to the text or

sources where

appropriate.

0 points

Did not post or

mischaracterized

concepts or facts related

to course content. Did

not present a discernible

or reasonable logic.

15 points

Respectfully responds to

peers and/or instructor in

a timely fashion and adds

value to the conversation

by providing constructive

feedback, asking follow-

up questions, and

presenting thoughtful,

reflective comments.

Posts are timely and meet

expectations for the

frequency of posts.

10 points

Responds to a fellow

student, adding some

value to the discussion.

5 points

Peer responses have

some or minimal relevant

content, and/or are off-

topic, and/or contain(s)

no relevant information.

0 points

Does not post a response

to the topic assignment.

10 points

Posts complete and

timely responses to the

discussion topic or

question.

7 points

May miss set deadlines or

lack a sufficient number

of posts.

3 points

Did not post or respond

during the time period

allowed.

0 points

Did not post and did not

respond during the time

period allowed.

Exceeds
40 points minimum

Meets
30 points minimum

Needs Improvement
20 points minimum

Does not meet
0 points minimum

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic Company College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 3 Decision Making and Problem Solving (MGT 312) Due Date: End of Week 13, 04-05-2024 Course Name: Decision Making and Problem Student’s Name: Solving

Description Assignment 1: HCM-550: Healthcare Policy Analysis Interview Regarding a Healthcare Policy or Assessment (110 points)  Financing healthcare

Description Assignment 1: HCM-550: Healthcare Policy Analysis Interview Regarding a Healthcare Policy or Assessment (110 points)  Financing healthcare is one of the greatest priorities for the healthcare system in Saudi Arabia. While policymakers agree that more Saudi nationals need health insurance coverage, the debate often revolves around how it should