Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application Paper Goal:

 

Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application Paper

Goal:

Analyze and evaluate a middle range theory.  You will select a middle range theory and identify application of nursing theories into clinical practice
.

Content Requirements:

1. Components of the theory

·

· Discuss the major concepts of the theory

· Philosophical basis or worldview change, advancing health

2. Structural aspects of the theory

·

· Discuss the framework of the theory.

3. Identify an area of your practice where this theory could be applicable

·

· What question does the theory help to answer?

· Describe the area of interest in relationship to the theory/theoretical model.

· Is it appropriate for the practice setting and is it applicable?

· Discuss the strength and weakness of the theory. If there is weakness, discuss what makes it difficult to be used in practice.

4. Use of theory in clinical practice.

·

· Performing a literature review is essential to completing this section. If there is no literature available about the application of this theory in practice, address reason(s) why based on your findings.

5. Evaluation of theory

·

· Is this theory used to understand and apply into practice?

· What difficulties did you encounter or would anticipate encountering in using this theory?

·

· What would make this theory more usable or applicable to practice?

Submission Instructions:

· The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

· The paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions.)

· The paper is to be 3 – 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

· Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

Essay/Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Identification of Main Issues/Problems

Distinguished – 4 points
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

Excellent – 3 points
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

Fair – 2 points
Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

Poor – 1 point
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

Distinguished – 4 points
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

Excellent – 3 points
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

Fair – 2 points
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

Poor – 1 point
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

Distinguished – 4 points
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

Excellent – 3 points
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

Fair – 2 points
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

Poor – 1 point
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

Distinguished – 4 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

Excellent – 3 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

Fair – 2 points
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

Poor – 1 point
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4 points

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished – 4 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

Excellent – 3 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

Fair – 2 points
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

Poor – 1 point
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4 points

Total Points 

20

Grading Rubric 

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

This assignment DOES generate a TII score. It is the student’s responsibility to review your score and make appropriate adjustments. Students who use AI for writing their papers will receive an automatic zero (0) for a grade.  

 

image1.png

image2.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please see the attachment for instructions. Week 9 Discussion: Organizations Serving Vulnerable Populations In your initial post to this discussion

Please see the attachment for instructions. Week 9 Discussion: Organizations Serving Vulnerable Populations In your initial post to this discussion forum, respond to the following prompts. Include personal and practice-related experiences or observations as examples that support your response. 1. Explore an organization that serves a vulnerable population. · Select

 Please see details of the assignment in the attachment.  Teachers certification course

 Please see details of the assignment in the attachment.  Teachers certification course SS13 Qualities of Effective Teachers Objective: After reviewing effective educators’ qualities, the learner will self-reflect to assess their strengths and weaknesses for personal growth.   Now that you have stepped through some foundational strategies that will play a key

Please details of the assignment in the attachment. Teachers certification course

Please details of the assignment in the attachment. Teachers certification course SS12 Social and Emotional Learning Objective:  Learners will identify and describe five components of a social emotional learning program.  Academic Language: language vocabulary needed for this module: · Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) · Self-awareness · Self-management · Decision

Module 3 – Case GLOBAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT/REWARDS Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Critical Thinking, Emphasized level In this

Module 3 – Case GLOBAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT/REWARDS Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Critical Thinking, Emphasized level In this assignment, your critical-thinking skills will be assessed. The critical-thinking rubric will be useful for this purpose. In HRM401, they were assessed at the “introduced” level. In this course, HRM402, critical-thinking skills will be