As pressures and demands for more standardized business structures fluctuate in society, leaders may experience challenges in developing consistent methods for solving public health problems. Though consistency may be necessary for enacting change, within many areas and localities, consistency may not be an option. As a result, a leader must be able to use a systems thinking approach to evaluate the best method for leadership contingent upon the circumstance.
For this Discussion, select a current event related to public health and leadership, not previously discussed in earlier weeks (CHOOSE ONE!!). With the event you selected, apply Fiedler’s Contingency Model. Consider the actions and interactions between leaders and subordinates with the application of this model.
By Day 4
Post a description (2 Pages, APA format) of the event you selected. Then explain whether the leader’s interaction with his or her subordinates was task-motivated or relationship-motivated. Justify your answer based on Fiedler’s Contingency Model
How to solve
Current Events in Public Health Leadership and the Fiedler Contingency Theory Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
The selected current event related to public health and leadership is the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has affected millions of people worldwide and has forced leaders to make critical decisions to combat the spread of the virus. In this discussion, we will apply Fiedler’s Contingency Model to evaluate the leader’s interaction with subordinates concerning their task-motivated or relationship-motivated behavior.
Answer:
The leader’s interaction with his or her subordinates during the COVID-19 pandemic was predominantly task-motivated. This approach was necessary to develop a strategic response to the unprecedented challenge of the pandemic. Fiedler’s Contingency Model suggests that leaders should modify their behavior based on the situation’s favorableness. In the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, the situation was highly unfavorable and required a more task-oriented approach.
Leaders who employed a relationship-motivated approach for managing the pandemic would have struggled to implement necessary social distancing measures and lockdowns that would limit the spread of the virus. A relationship-motivated leader’s primary concern would be maintaining social harmony rather than making challenging decisions to control the pandemic’s spread. Additionally, a relationship-oriented leader would be less likely to enforce strict measures or regulations relating to hygiene, masks, and others, impeding the fight against COVID-19.
In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic required leaders to adopt task-motivated behavior to confront the unprecedented challenge. This aligns with Fiedler’s Contingency Model, which suggests that leaders should adjust their approach based on the situation’s favorableness. A more relationship-oriented approach would have impeded preventing the virus’s spread, making it difficult to control the pandemic’s impact on public health.
