For this milestone, you will start working on the case for Final Project I: Malpractice. Below is a link to the case you will investigate. This link is also provided in the Final Project I Guidelines and Rubric document.
Surgery: Iturralde v. Hilo Medical Center USA
Prompt: In this milestone, you will complete part of your analysis of the malpractice case. Using this analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction:
A. Summarize the case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period the incident occurred.
·
II. Medical Malpractice Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to address the legal components, the malpractice policies similar to this case, and the standard of care given to the patient and how it was breached. Then, you will draw connections to how this malpractice case impacted stakeholders and healthcare consumers outside of the case.
A. Explain the key legal components of the case, including the nature of the issue and the rules that applied.
·
B. Determine relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case.
·
C. Analyze the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim. Be sure to apply what the law states about standard of care to support whether or not it was breached in the case.
·
D. Analyze how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. For example, would this case have a similar impact on a person from a culture different from the one in the case? How could this incident change the views of these healthcare consumers toward the healthcare system?
·
E. Assess the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity. To what extent was the healthcare provider held accountable?
·
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
How to Solve Overview: The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a physician was found liable for medical malpractice. You will focus on facts pertaining to the med Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
The Iturralde v. Hilo Medical Center USA case is a legal dispute that involved medical malpractice. The case involves a surgery that was performed on the plaintiff, Iturralde, which resulted in complications that caused him severe pain and suffering. The following analysis will address the legal components of the case, including malpractice policies, standard of care, and the impact of the case on healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds.
II. Medical Malpractice Component:
A. The key legal components of the case include the nature of the issue and the applicable rules. Iturralde was subjected to a surgery that resulted in complications. The case involves claims of negligence and medical malpractice against the hospital and the surgeon who performed the operation.
B. Relevant malpractice policies were in place to address the issues within the case, and these policies were violated. The hospital and the surgeon were responsible for delivering medical care that met the standards of care and resulted in a positive health outcome for the patient. However, their failure to abide by this policy constituted medical malpractice.
C. The standard of care provided to the victim was evaluated, and it was found that it was breached. The law states that healthcare providers must administer medical care that is consistent with the prevailing medical practice in their locality. However, in this case, the surgeon deviated from the standard of care and caused harm to the patient.
D. The malpractice case may have had different implications for healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. The impact of the case on these consumers may depend on their level of trust in the healthcare system and their familiarity with medical practices. The incident could change the views of these consumers toward the healthcare system if they find that they cannot trust their healthcare providers.
E. The severity of the case would determine the level of accountability for the healthcare provider. In this case, the healthcare provider was found liable for medical malpractice and held accountable for the patient’s injuries and suffering.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Iturralde v. Hilo Medical Center USA case is an example of medical malpractice that involved a breach of the standard of care and resulted in severe health complications for the patient. The implications of the case may vary for healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds based on their levels of trust and familiarity with medical practices. The severity of the case resulted in the healthcare provider being held accountable for their failure to deliver the required standard of care.
