This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week’s content and to interact with your classmates.
- Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm
- Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm
*To view the grading rubric for this discussion, click the name of the discussion, then click “Grading Information”
Discussion Questions:
- Describe how you see the U.S. approach to health rights differs from other nations.
- Include your response to a citizen of a socialized medicine country when asked about the fact that health care is far from being a fundamental right in American law.
- Post a picture of what no-duty-to-treat means to you.
- Describe why you selected that picture.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: As a medical professor responsible for creating college assignments and evaluating student performance, it is essential to have an informed perspective on the U.S. approach to health rights and duty-to-treat policies.
1. The U.S. approach to health rights differs significantly from other nations. Unlike other countries that have socialized medicine, the U.S. does not view health care as a fundamental right. Instead, it is considered a privilege that individuals must earn through employment or purchase through private insurance. As a result, there are significant disparities in access to medical care based on socioeconomic status.
If asked by a citizen of a socialized medicine country about the lack of health care as a fundamental right in American law, it would be essential to acknowledge the flaws in the U.S. system and the associated challenges. However, it would also be pertinent to highlight the benefits of free-market health care, including faster drug development and greater access to advanced medical technologies.
2. Picture: [insert picture of a doctor refusing to treat a patient]
I selected this picture to illustrate the concept of no-duty-to-treat, which refers to the legal principle that medical professionals are not obligated to provide care to an individual unless there is an established relationship between the patient and physician. This principle is a contentious issue in the medical community, as it raises several ethical concerns regarding the responsibility of physicians to provide care to individuals in need.
