HC 466 Herzing University Week 7 Strategic Planning Models Presentation

Unit 7 Assignment 2 – Strategic Planning Models

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

A strategic planning model can be helpful in assisting leadership in making decisions that impact the organization. Communicating purpose behind changes (and strategies involved) is part of being a leader. In this assessment, select a strategic planning model and prepare an employee presentation on change.

Instructions

  • Review the 5 strategic planning model infographics:
  • Recall the professional experience of change used in the assessments for Units 1-6.
    Select one of the 5 models to apply to the professional experience (used in Units 1-6).
  • Create a PowerPoint presentation to educate the managers and staff on the change (from the professional experience). The presentation should:
    • Describe the components of the selected model.
    • Explain how the model is being applied to the professional experience (used in Units 1-6).
    • Consist of at least 10 slides (not including the title slide and reference slide).
  • Complete additional research on this topic as necessary. Include at least 2 references, formatted APA style.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours, 30 minutes

a.

Rubric

HC466 – Unit 7 Assignment 2 – Strategic Planning Models

HC466 – Unit 7 Assignment 2 – Strategic Planning Models

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of KnowledgePRICE-P

30.0 pts

Level 5

Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

27.0 pts

Level 4

Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

24.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

21.0 pts

Level 2

Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

18.0 pts

Level 1

There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content

30.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

27.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

24.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

21.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research

20.0 pts

Level 5

Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes

10.0 pts

Level 5

Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).

6.0 pts

Level 1

Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
As a medical professor responsible for creating assignments and providing feedback to medical college students, I understand the importance of strategic planning in aiding the decision-making process of healthcare leadership. In this assignment, students are required to review 5 infographics of strategic planning models and create a PowerPoint presentation to educate managers and staff on the selected planning model, as well as how it can be applied to a professional experience that was used in previous assessments. The presentation should consist of at least 10 slides and include additional research with 2 references formatted in APA style.

Answer:
The selected strategic planning model for the employee presentation on change is the Basic Strategic Planning Model. This model focuses on the fundamentals of strategic planning and includes the following components: mission and vision statements, goals and objectives, SWOT analysis, and action plans. The model is being applied to the professional experience of implementing a new electronic health record system (EHR) in a healthcare organization.

The first component of the Basic Strategic Planning Model is creating a mission and vision statement. The mission statement should clearly articulate the purpose of the organization and what it stands for, while the vision statement describes the desired future state. The organization’s mission and vision statement relevant to the implementation of the new EHR system could be: “To provide high-quality, patient-centered care with the latest technology and improved efficiency.” and “To become a leader in healthcare technology through the implementation of state-of-the-art EHR systems.”

The second component is setting goals and objectives. Goals are broad milestones the organization aims to achieve, while objectives are specific and measurable steps that lead to the accomplishment of those goals. In the case of implementing a new EHR system, the goals could be to improve patient outcomes and increase efficiency, while the objectives could be to reduce wait times and enhance communication among healthcare providers.

The third component involves conducting a SWOT analysis, which is an assessment of the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. This analysis helps identify internal and external factors that could impact the success of the EHR implementation. Strengths may include a dedicated staff and strong financial resources, while weaknesses could be resistance to change and lack of training. Opportunities may include potential cost savings and improved patient care, while threats could be external factors such as changes in regulations or new competitors in the market.

The final component is the action plan, which outlines the specific steps that will be taken to achieve the goals and objectives. This may include implementing the EHR system in phases, providing extensive training to staff, and conducting regular assessments to measure progress.

In conclusion, the Basic Strategic Planning Model is a simple but effective approach to strategic planning that can be applied to a variety of situations, including the implementation of a new EHR system in a healthcare organization. By following the model’s components, healthcare leaders can create a clear and comprehensive plan that will guide decision-making and ensure success.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

WU Detail and Dynamic Complexity Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

Are you overwhelmed by complexity? If so, you are not alone. Peter Senge notes that people are now able to “create far more information that anyone can absorb,” and he continues to say that the “scale of complexity is without precedent” (2006, p. 69). This “detail” complexity can make managing

Pediatric Health & Medical Worksheet Nursing Assignment Help

Provider: i. Questions for HPI When did these symptoms begin? Is the child experience exercise intolerance? Any shortness of breath/signs of respiratory distress? History of genetic conditions? ii. Questions for ROS Poor feeding? Any newborn cardiac concerns? Previous cardiac history? Any pain, weakness, coldness to the extremities? Fluid retention? Cough

Health & Medical Capital Budgeting at Cleveland Clinic Nursing Assignment Help

Respond to each of the following prompts or questions: Using the information provided in the Los Reyes Hospital case study from Module Three, what capital expenditures may the selected departments need to budget? Considering the organization you selected, what is a capital expenditure that may be needed that would result

NVCC Service Implementation and Elements of Financial Nursing Assignment Help

Instructions: Part 1 1.Read Chapter 10, Capko. -Critique either Dr. Grainger’s or Mid-South Pulmomary Specialists efforts in developing  new services. -What lessons did you learn as related to new service development?   -List three main items which you must address before implementing a new service.  Instructions: Part 2 -The physicians

Healthcare is reimbursed in a variety of ways. The Nursing Assignment Help

Healthcare is reimbursed in a variety of ways. The prospective payment method is one of those ways. This paper will be about the prospective payment method where diagnosis-related groupings (DRGs) forms the basis for payment. Research and explain the origin, purpose, and description of DRGs. Include what payment is based on.

NUR 630 FIU Impact on Healthcare Systems and Public Health Nursing Assignment Help

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disabilities, or Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia In recent years, there have been reports linking autism to vaccinations. After studying Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources, address the following in a well-written discussion post: Explain the controversy regarding vaccines as a possible cause of autism spectrum disorder. Does the