To complete this assignment, review the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Introduction
A. Describe a specific gap in the delivery of healthcare. Include the specific population affected by the gap.
B. Briefly describe the history of this gap in access to healthcare. Has this been an issue historically, or is it a modern issue? C. Explain the impact that the socioeconomic background of the population has on their access to healthcare.
D. Describe how the healthcare delivered to the population is affected by the gap in access.
E. Predict any potential implications if this gap in access is not addressed. - Existing Initiatives
A. Explain an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access.
B. Explain the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access.
C. Describe the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative. Consider when it was developed and what factors wereconsidered.
D. Describe the resources required to fund the existing initiative.
E. Explain why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement. - Regulation
- Explain a current regulation regarding the existing initiative that has been identified and the context in which it was developed. Why is thisregulation important?
- Describe the regulatory level that the existing initiative is being addressed at. Consider the potential for multiple levels of regulation.
- Conclusion: Explain the effectiveness of the existing initiative and associated regulations in addressing this gap in the delivery of healthcare to the target population. Does the initiative align with initiative in place to support other gaps? Are there conflicting interests to be aware of?
PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS NUMBERED. THE TOPIC I CHOSE WAS A GAP IN QUALITY RELATED TO CARE COORDINATION FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS. I WILL ATTACH THE RUBRIC FOR MORE CLARITY. WHAT THE PAPER SHOULD LOOK LIKE AND THE INFORMATION IT SHOULD HAVE IN NUMBERED ABOVE.
THIS WEBSITE SHOULD HELP FOR REFERENCES AND OTHER RELEVANT REFERENCES THAT YOU CAN FIND. APA STYLE.
Expert Solution Preview
1. Introduction:
A gap in quality related to care coordination for individuals with chronic illness has been identified as a critical concern in healthcare. The specific population affected by this gap includes individuals who suffer from chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. The inadequate delivery of healthcare to these individuals can lead to poor health outcomes, decreased quality of life, and increased healthcare costs. This has been an issue historically, but it has become more prevalent in recent years due to an aging population and an increase in chronic illnesses. The socioeconomic background of the population plays a significant role in their access to healthcare, with those from lower-income backgrounds facing greater barriers to quality care. The gap in access affects the healthcare delivered to the population by delaying diagnosis and treatment, leading to increased healthcare costs and complications. If this gap is not addressed, it could further exacerbate health disparities and increase healthcare costs.
2. Existing Initiatives:
One existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address the gap in access to healthcare for individuals with chronic illness is the Chronic Care Model. The specific goals of the Chronic Care Model are to improve the quality of care, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance patient outcomes for individuals with chronic illness. This initiative was developed in the late 90s in response to the growing prevalence of chronic diseases and the inadequacy of traditional healthcare models in managing these conditions. The resources required to fund this initiative include increased primary care services, care coordination services, and patient education programs. However, the Chronic Care Model is not meeting its intended purpose and requires improvement as it primarily focuses on the management of physical symptoms while neglecting mental and emotional health.
3. Regulation:
A current regulation regarding the Chronic Care Model is the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015. This regulation was developed to address the issue of Medicare payment reform and reward value-based care. It is essential as it promotes the shift from fee-for-service to value-based payment models, which is critical to improving the quality of care for individuals with chronic illnesses. The existing initiative is being addressed at the federal regulatory level since it involves Medicare payment reform.
4. Conclusion:
The Chronic Care Model and associated regulations have made significant strides in addressing the gap in healthcare delivery for individuals with chronic illnesses. However, it is essential to align this initiative with the existing initiative in place to support other gaps, and there are potentially conflicting interests to be aware of, such as incentivizing particular treatment types or care providers over others. Therefore, it is crucial to remain attentive to potential unintended consequences and continue to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of this initiative and associated regulations in providing quality care for individuals with chronic illnesses.
